Skip to main content
SHARPER IRON
“As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another.” (Proverbs 27:17)
  • About
    • About Sharper Iron
    • Doctrinal Statement
    • Contact
    • Search
  • Forum
    • Forum Home
    • Comment Guidelines
    • Search
  • Account
    • Log in
    • Register

Use Your Greek and Hebrew!

By TylerR on Tue, 10/13/26
Biblical Languages
0
Image

Too many pastors let their language skills go. This article is my plea to pastors to get those skills back. I’m not a language ninja. I’m just a pastor who is broadly competent in the biblical languages—not because I’m particularly gifted, but because I use Greek and Hebrew each week.

I’m a member of an online community of pastors and academics—many whom have (or nearly have) their PhD. Many of these guys playfully malign biblical studies as a discipline, and many confess they have let their language skills go. As a result they, especially the pastors among them, are often slaves to commentaries. They buy the latest volumes and can speak confidently about this or that interpretation. But, too often, their opinions are mediated through commentaries. This parable means that—and Fred Smith argues persuasively for the position in his awesome new ZECNT commentary!

Too often, the discussion never filters down to grammar and syntax … because they’ve forgotten the languages. It’s become a joke in this community that I always mention languages! Commentaries are good. Commentaries are helpful. The Holy Spirit really has spoken to other believers, in different times, about the same text you’re studying. So, of course, buy good commentaries—especially if they’re older (and likely free). John Broadus’ Matthew commentary in the old American Commentary series is a great example (this set is the father of the New American Commentary series, and the grandfather of the CSB series).

But … what happened to Greek? If you can’t evaluate the evidence yourself, then you don’t really know whether Fred Smith is out to lunch in his awesome ZECNT commentary. Sure, you can check five other commentaries and go with the law of averages, but how does that help you figure out (and preach) what, exactly, the “gift of God” is at Ephesians 2:8? You can’t settle that without knowing syntax, and you can’t do that if you’re leaning exclusively on Fred Smith and his allegedly next-level Greek analysis. Do you want to have your own informed opinion on this issue? Or do you want to bet it all on Dr. Fred Smith, and hope nobody asks detailed questions?

If you’re a seminary-trained pastor, you probably spent four or five semesters studying Koine Greek, and four semesters grinding through Hebrew. It will come back. Please get back into one verse per week from Greek or Hebrew as you do your sermon prep. Dust off or re-purchase your second-year syntax textbook (I love Richard Young’s Intermediate New Testament Greek) and figure out a few tricky turns of phrase from your sermon text. Buy the volumes in Baylor’s Handbook on the Greek Text series, or Zondervan’s Exegetical Commentary on the Greek New Testament set. It will come back.

If you begin to use your languages, the commentaries will no longer be a crutch or a filter between you and God’s word. I fear too many pastors encounter the text through a commentary. That’s too bad, because you’re missing so much. For example, I always wondered what on earth Paul meant when he wrote that we must be “diligent to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Eph 4:3). What even is a “bond of peace”? Well, it’s plausible that the preposition in the phrase ἐν τῷ συνδέσμῳ τῆς εἰρήνης expresses means = “by means of the bond of peace.” We can keep the unity of the spirit by remembering the bond of peace we share together in relationship with Jesus—this transcends our petty disagreements.

Here are four practical reasons why every pastor should use their Greek, from Ephesians 4:19. Paul is speaking about the way of life of unbelievers: “And they, having become callous, have given themselves over to sensuality for the practice of every kind of impurity with greediness” (LSB).

  • What is happening with the “callousness”? Is it a temporal or perhaps attendant circumstance situation (“having become calloused”)? Or is it causal—“because they are calloused”? This matters.
  • Why do so many translations render the callousness as a passive = “become calloused”? It’s in active voice with a perfect tense-form (or, if you prefer, a perfective aspect), which suggests it ought to be something like “because they are now calloused.” It’s likely they’re forced to use a passive sense because they see the participle as temporal or attendant circumstance (see no. 1, above).
  • Many good translations render ἀσελγείᾳ as “licentiousness.” What does this mean, in English? Many opt to color this with a sexual tinge = “sensuality,” because Paul often speaks about sexual sins. But, this is not necessarily true. Is this section warning about sexual debauchery, or about the debauchery of unbelievers in general? In other words, what are you gonna warn the congregation about as you preach this? So, this analysis matters. You can be at the mercy of commentators, or you can also do your own research.
  • What is the “every kind of impurity” after which unbelievers greedily chase? Again, many translations put a sexual spin on ἀκαθαρσίας (“uncleanness”) which doesn’t have to be there. It can simply be wild, out-of-control and sinful behavior in general. Is Paul warning against all kinds of sexual abandonment, or all kinds of sinful abandonment in general?

You can either deal with these issues through the medium of a commentator, or you can evaluate them yourself. You may not even know these issues exist if you just use your English bible + commentaries. I’ll always be grateful to my language professors at Maranatha Seminary—to Dr. Andrew Hudson for teaching me Greek, and to Dr. Andrew Goodwill who (years later!) taught me Hebrew. I received a C+ in many of my Greek classes at seminary. If a guy like me can stick with it and become (sorta!) competent over the years, so can you!

My rendering of Ephesians 4:19:

  • Who (οἵτινες = ante. is the unbelievers (i.e., Gentiles)), because they are calloused (ἀπηλγηκότες = adverbial, causal; intensive perfect + active voice = no passive sense in translation), handed themselves over (ἑαυτοὺς παρέδωκαν = they act upon themselves) to sinful, out of control behavior (ἀσελγείᾳ, see Exegetical Dictionary of NT; dat. indir. obj.) in order to (εἰς = purpose, goal) greedily (ἐν πλεονεξίᾳ = the manner of this chase/practice) chase after every depravity (ἀκαθαρσίας = obj. gen.).

Tyler Robbins 2016 v2

Tyler Robbins is a bi-vocational pastor at Sleater Kinney Road Baptist Church, in Olympia WA. He also works in State government. He blogs as the Eccentric Fundamentalist.

0
1

Discussion

Profile picture for user Aaron Blumer
Aaron Blumer

NewCase uses and such

Tue, 10/13/26

Agree, get the skills keep the skills.

I have to say, though that things like the uses of the dative case, uses of the genitive case, tense/aspect: these seem to always come as a set of possibilities, and rarely as “it’s definitely meant like this.” So, calibrate the certainty. Do I have to preach a point that depends on a particular use of the dative in the verse? I studiously avoid doing that, because it’s usually a moderate to low certainty scenario. But there are often two or three possibilities that are very high certainty as a group. So, I don’t know for sure the use of the dative here is A, but it’s like 95% certain its either A, B, or C.

So I look for a way to preach it that works for A, B or C.

So I’m not going out on a limb exegetically.

Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.

0
1
Profile picture for user Bert Perry
Bert Perry

NewEven as a dilettante

Tue, 10/13/26

It should be noted that even without the knowledge of verb tenses and the ability to translate entire passages, getting into the original languages on a very basic level can be extremely powerful. One can figure out with a look at BDB, Kittel, or whatever that, for example, the ancient usage of a word is far different from the modern translation, or ancient words are connected in fascinating ways by their etamologies (for example, one finds "shalom" all over in Hebrew in unexpected places).

Nothing against verb tenses. I'm just not there yet. But there's a ton of good simply from looking at usage, etamology, and the like available to beginners.

Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.

0
0
Profile picture for user Aaron Blumer
Aaron Blumer

NewSemantic range and overlap

Tue, 10/13/26

One thing that happens across languages is that the range of meaning a word has, semantic range, based on usage, doesn’t align with any word in the target language. So translators have to look for places where two words have some overlap and try to find the best compromise.

Where skilled translators are at work, the Greek is never going to be completely different from the English. But there are going to be a lot of places where the Greek word’s range of meaning is different from the nearest English equivalent. But there will always be overlap—and it’s the overlap that translators are trying to capture.

With denotation, connotation, and nuance—all shaped mostly by context—it’s challenging work. I often compare strong English translations then dig into why they are different where they’re different. Translations like NET include a lot of ‘why we did what we did there’ notes, which are fascinating and helpful. I wish all the translations did that.

Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.

0
0
User image
RajeshG

NewThanks

Wed, 10/14/26

Although I disagree with some things about your understanding of what the Greek teaches in Ephesians 4:19, I appreciate the exhortation that you have given in this article to use the languages in studying the Bible. Thanks.

0
0
Profile picture for user T Howard
T Howard

NewKeeping the languages

Wed, 10/14/26

Here are three practices I have done since seminary to keep my language skills sharp:

  1. Translate and parse every passage I preach. The only exception is when I’m in narrative and the passage is crazy long.
  2. Read through my Greek NT every other year. I rotate between reading through my English Bible in a year and reading through my Greek NT in a year.
  3. Read books about Greek grammar / syntax / linguistics


I’ve lost a lot of my Hebrew vocab, sad to say. I used to be able to read through the Torah in a year with a Hebrew reader. Now, I can no longer do that.

Jacob Cerone published a book a few years ago that has daily Scripture readings in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin. I went through that when it first was published. That was helpful.

0
3
User image
RajeshG

NewBasic Greek prepositions pie chart

Sat, 10/17/26

Having taught first-year NT Greek as a teaching graduate assistant for 3 years, I learned first-hand how hard it is for many students to learn and assimilate key information that is important to gain a basic level of proficiency in reading NT Greek. Later, I created a number of simple tools to that end.

"If you’ve ever studied elementary NT Greek, you probably found it at least somewhat challenging to learn and memorize what the basic Greek prepositions mean when they take their objects in different cases. My new Basic Greek Prepositions Pie Chart helps make that task easier by pictorially separating the prepositions according to their meanings with the three different cases, accusative, genitive, and dative, in which they take their objects!"

0
1
Profile picture for user Aaron Blumer
Aaron Blumer

NewNice!

Mon, 10/19/26

RajeshG wrote: My new Basic Greek Prepositions Pie Chart helps make that task easier by

Nice! I always found chart-making helpful also. For me, the act of making the chart was, itself a great learning exercise. So then, ironically, didn’t need the chart so much. But as time progresses, you end up with a lot of charts and most of us—myself included—don’t have the sort of brain to keep all that straight.

So, yes, the charts!

Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.

0
1
Profile picture for user Don Johnson
Don Johnson

NewMy 2c

Mon, 10/19/26

Yes to this, although, alas, I never really had enough Hebrew to really retain it. That was my fault, I let myself be intimidated by the negative attitudes of others and left it till my last year of seminary. So... didn't learn enough to really retain it.

On the Greek side of things, I would like to recommend SIL's Exegetical Summary Series. It helps identify key words and the arguments of all the commentaries on key exegetical questions verse by verse. It identifies where the questions are and offers no final conclusions.

I've found this extremely helpful as I wrestle with the text and then see how the commentaries handle it.

Maranatha!
Don Johnson
Jer 33.3

0
2
User image
RajeshG

NewBrenton's Septuagint

Mon, 10/19/26

I have read very extensively in Brenton's Septuagint and found it to be profoundly helpful and would highly recommend reading in it because the parallel columns of the English and Greek texts make reading the Greek text much more manageable than it would be to try to read just the Greek text by itself.

Over the years, I have discovered some very valuable insights in the LXX that have direct application to how some NT Greek passages should be understood, including my treatment of one passage (Haman, Head Coverings, and First Corinthians 11:1-16) that has gotten some attention in a Wikipedia article (I did not have anything to do with my article's being cited in that Wikipedia article and was surprised when I learned that it had been cited there).

I have not yet read the Apocrypha in his edition and may never get around to doing so; however, I have done considerable research in the Apocrypha by using BibleWorks 10 to search for occurrences of various NT Greek words to see how they are used in the Apocrypha.

0
0
Profile picture for user TylerR
TylerR

In reply to My 2c by Don Johnson

NewGreat

Tue, 10/20/26

Don Johnson wrote:

Yes to this, although, alas, I never really had enough Hebrew to really retain it. That was my fault, I let myself be intimidated by the negative attitudes of others and left it till my last year of seminary. So… didn’t learn enough to really retain it.

On the Greek side of things, I would like to recommend SIL’s Exegetical Summary Series. It helps identify key words and the arguments of all the commentaries on key exegetical questions verse by verse. It identifies where the questions are and offers no final conclusions.

I’ve found this extremely helpful as I wrestle with the text and then see how the commentaries handle it.

Thanks for this recommendation, Don. I’ve seen those volumes in my Logos library, but I’ve never used them! I think my Hebrew is going to go the same way—I don’t feel I have a good a grasp of it, and the vocabulary is crazy. But, I do my best to keep at it.

Tyler is a pastor in Olympia, WA and works in State government.

0
0
User image
Larry

NewGood reminder and helpful. I…

Wed, 10/21/26

Good reminder and helpful. I translate the passage (or at least part of the passage in longer ones) every week, whether Greek or Hebrew. I used to read more Hebrew from the Reader’s edition but I have not done that in a while. I should get back to it.

I would offer a slight caution however. There was an old meme circulating along the lines that “50 scholars with several hundreds years of combined knowledge and experience translated this text but I have more insight since I have had two years of seminary language.” The caution is that the translations do a good job and it is highly unlikely that we are going to correct them or discover something that they didn’t know when they translated it. Of course when translations differ, having the equipment to evaluate is helpful, but leaning on exegetical commentaries is going to be more beneficial than trying to figure it out on our own.

But having said that, IMO, pastors should be translating at least something every week.

0
1
Profile picture for user Bert Perry
Bert Perry

NewIt's the nuances

Wed, 10/21/26

To be sure, there are great translations out there, and yes, it is dangerous business to think that one's few semesters of language training empowers one to greatly improve on the work of guys who actually wrote the reference works you own. Granted. Perspicuity of the Scriptures applies as well in a good, appropriate translation.

That said, no translation can carry every nuance, and there are a lot of opportunities for where the secondary nuance (tertiary, etc..) can add meaning to what one is reading. Great examples include many Biblical names and their significance. So it is a way of getting to know the Scriptures better, and transitively speaking, their Author.

Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.

0
0

Related . . .

Topics: Biblical Languages, Bible Study, Ministry of the Word
  • From the Archives: Should All Believers Learn Biblical Languages?
  • Lingua-Phobia Among American Preachers
  • Pastor, Are You Making These Common Lexical Mistakes?
  • Free Online Hebrew Course announced
  • Peter Gentry on the Biblical Languages

Pagination

  • Page 1
  • Next page

More by TylerR

  • What's the Mystery of Ephesians 3?
  • Revelation 7
  • Six Rules to Understand the Bible
  • The Bible’s Big Story
  • Why Good Christians Disagree About Israel's Future

Pagination

  • Page 1
  • Next page

Featured Resources

AU Logo

Cover Image

View at Amazon


(About Amazon links)

It is honorable for a man to stop striving, Since any fool can start a quarrel.

(NKJV, Proverbs 20:3)

Footer

  • About
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Forum

Since 2005

Image
2005 SI Logo Image