“There will be power at stake, but also tremendous profit as the purveyors of opinion seek to build audiences and sell advertisements. But we are not helpless. We can be more fair to each other and thus create the conditions for a more fruitful discourse.” - Public Discourse
- About
- Forum
- Account
Discussion
NewExcellent
A great read! I wish there was a political party that thought this way.
More…
And at the end… (emphasis added)
He has described the problem well. I’m not so sure there is a grass roots/citizen solution, though. But if a hundred million or so decided to behave this way, it sure couldn’t hurt.
Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.
NewNo easy solution
>>I’m not so sure there is a grass roots/citizen solution, though.<<
Agreed. As long as most of the voters (or even a minority making the most noise) prefer to be perpetually outraged rather than having to think and have “quality discourse,” and enjoy screaming and acting like Antifa, it won’t matter what the rest of us want. The politicians will react to what they see gives them the most votes. People who think and can argue above a 5th-grade playground “got ya last” level are now in the minority and given our current educational system, likely to remain so.
It used to be that the media and other institutions would help drive the discourse to substantial topics and actually promote using good judgment rather than shouting others down, but since they draw from the same pool of poorly educated and badly socialized new workers, they are only making things worse.
I’m afraid its going to take something really drastic to turn things around, and I’m not sure I want to live through a societal upheaval that large.
Dave Barnhart