“Yesterday, we found out that insurance will not cover the damage to our campus in this instance… . We would appreciate your prayers and, if you are able to help, we have the following needs…” Letter
- About
- Forum
- Account
“Yesterday, we found out that insurance will not cover the damage to our campus in this instance… . We would appreciate your prayers and, if you are able to help, we have the following needs…” Letter
Discussion
Newcontroversial perspective from 10 yrs in developing nations
insurance = scam
(mostly)
Or as Nassim Taleb might say, you attempt to protect yourself from Black Swan (unpredictable, damaging) effects with cost of dramatically increasing fragility.
NewFlooding & insurance (I've done some research)
Generally:
Why I researched it: I am down slope from some residential lots. Down slope of me is a large storm water drain. Heavy rains flood my backyard. My lower level (a “walkout” level) has never had water encroachment (we are drain tiled w a sump pump) and the flood typically dissipates in a day. But my neighbor’s lower level (he’s about 3 feet lower than me), has flooded.
Twitter
Jim's Doctrinal Statement
NewInsurance Companies are Not Your Friends
I’m currently involved with a large insurance claim at my job.
Lesson Learned # 1: Insurance companies are not your friends.
NewNah, insurance is great
You just have to know what you’re covered for. It’s not all like that scene from The Incredibles. Any good realtor will tell you what Jim noted; if you’re in a likely flood plain, you need to consider getting flood insurance.
Another thought; if you’re building, consider retaining the fill dirt from digging your foundation and build your house a few feet above what was the grade level to reduce the likelihood of flooding. The house I grew up in in NW Indiana was built up a bit this way, and suffice it to say that it reduced the work of the sump pump quite a bit.
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
NewInsurance
About 10 years ago we had a severe hail storm hit the house. Damage:
All had to be replaced. Our insurance company at the time was Allstate. They were super. I think the damage was nearly $ 70,000.
Twitter
Jim's Doctrinal Statement
NewNot denying that it can't
Not denying that it can’t work out great for individuals, but I still consider it a net loss, in most cases—on the social and policy level.
What we should be working on, to my mind, is not insurance for everyone to make sure no one is ever financially ruined; we should be working on ameliorating what Scott Alexander calls “cost-disease.” I.e., the largely inexplicable and severe rise in prices and services which make insurance a virtual necessity in the modern, developed world.
NewInsurance may or may not be required
Insurance may or may not be required.
I would say that for Faith, its very prudent to have insurance - although they could not have anticipated the amount of rain that caused the flooding.
Twitter
Jim's Doctrinal Statement
NewNOT a scam
Insurance is not a scam. Read your policy. Make use of a good agent who can explain in detail what you are covered for, and what is not covered. It is no fault of the insurance company if you, out of ignorance, do not acquire the needed coverage.
Mr. LaVern G. Carpenter
Proverbs 3:1-12
NewLGCarpenter wrote:
But even coming to your point, how do you know what coverage you’ll need in the future? I mean really. Save special revelation, we are all ignorant of the future. If we actually knew what insurance we would need, insurers would never make money, would they? ;)
NewJim wrote:
I’ve noticed whenever I complain about stuff like this, people immediately seem to think I’m pointing fingers and trying to find someone to blame (doctors, insurance companies). But that’s not actually what I’m trying to say at all. These are systemic problems without easy solutions or cartoony villains to punish. But that doesn’t mean they aren’t problems.
NewHow do you know?
It’s really pretty simple. Any good realtor can get you quotes for flood insurance—it may be required in many areas—and you can weigh the cost and the likelihood of flooding versus the likely cost of repairs and your ability to weather that storm. In this case, given that huge floods in Ankeny are not that common (I can’t even find out whether they flooded much in the big year of 1993), my take is that they made the right decision. If indeed their costs for repairing 9 buildings are only $150k, they are on the right side of the cost equation here.
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.
NewBert Perry wrote:
But that very flood-proneness will also increase insurance costs, which may then themselves be unaffordable to some, etc. Then you get the Black Swan events, which are by their very nature unpredictable, and because your capital has been drained by insurance costs, you lack funds to recover from the actual event because you sunk them into insurance for events that never happened and—maybe bankruptcy.
Imagine if Faith’s damages had been 1mill. Could they recover then? By contrast, could they recover from such an event if they had money from the years of insurance payments sitting in emergency funds in a bank account? More likely.
A personal example: Last year I decided to forego health insurance. That very year I had a basal cell carcinoma procedure. The nurses and doctors kept trying to commiserating with me about how awful it was that I lacked health insurance. I didn’t feel too terrible about it, though, b/c the total cost of the doctor visits, procedure, and lab work was less than a quarter of what I had paid the previous year in health insurance!
Again, I’m not criticizing Faith or insurance companies here. I too have no doubt Faith made the right decision. I’m criticizing the system. We need to rethink it.
NewWSJ on under-insured homeowners
https://www.wsj.com/articles/american-homeowners-still-have-a-big-under…
….
Twitter
Jim's Doctrinal Statement
NewOn that cost disease
Jim’s comment reminds me of homeowners in the mountains near Boulder who never bothered to clear brush from around their homes, and were then horrified to learn that it was not always possible to save their homes when periodic wildfires followed the trail of kindling right to the front door. They also used to love their cedar shake roofs and cedar siding, which of course continued that path of kindling right into the house. I wonder how many of the homes lost in Northern California had owners who understood this principle.
Really, only two major ways of mitigating cost disease. Either you can ban idiot behaviors, or you can let people incur the costs of their decisions. Faith has done part of this by working with supporters to use sweat equity instead of insurance equity, and I commend them for that.
Aspiring to be a stick in the mud.