By sifilings on
Archive
Islam
No such thing as good Islam, Baptist theologian argues When you start with an adulterous warrior-profit, who is literally anti-Christ (though touting a non-biblical version of Jesus), mix in generous helpings of totalitarianism and the marginalization/persecution of women and non-Muslims, and cultivate tribalism, legalism, and victimism, you have a recipe for disaster

Discussion

Mon, 09/19/11
http://gofbw.com/Blog.asp?ID=13270
Islam has robbed the Arab, Persian, and Aceh people (and many other people groups) of much of their dignity, and 9/11 has highlighted the humiliation, the mother of all debacles. While Communism birthed and destroyed itself in about eighty years, Islam’s self-ruination has run for centuries and centuries, even as it has grown, largely through intimidation and suffocation. When you start with an adulterous warrior-prophet, who is literally anti-Christ (though touting a non-biblical version of Jesus), mix in generous helpings of totalitarianism and the marginalization/persecution of women and non-Muslims, and cultivate tribalism, legalism, and victimism, you have a recipe for disaster.

Twitter

Jim's Doctrinal Statement

Mon, 09/19/11
It looks like the work “prophet” is spelled correctly in the original article, but misspelled in the other, “profit.” Why would that be?

Mon, 09/19/11
Not to mention “adulterous warrior-prophet” might well describe David, writer of many psalms, which is what I was thinking as soon as I read the thread topic, but before I clicked on the thread.

Dave Barnhart

Mon, 09/19/11
[Fred Butler] It looks like the work “prophet” is spelled correctly in the original article, but misspelled in the other, “profit.” Why would that be?
Why would that be?

Answer: Not sure but I posted it as it was spelled in the Orlando Sentinal article.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sic] SIC (which I put in brackets ‘[] ‘) means “appears exactly as in the original source”

I presume the O.S. editor had a spelling lapse.

Twitter

Jim's Doctrinal Statement