Agnostic Marcelo Gleiser “famously blasted scientists who do not consider religious beliefs when they explain the universe’s origins. He terms such attitudes as ‘arrogant.’” - WRN
Related: Templeton Prize Winner: Marcelo Gleiser, Physicist Who Beholds the Universe’s Mysteries
Discussion
NewI would regard his work as very important
He is important in the sense that the media is putting the full court press on “deniers” and that all of us must believe them. I work for a secular newspaper and that’s what I see on my AP news feed all day long.
NewHeretics
In Alvin Plantinga’s Where the Conflict Really Lies, he makes a brief case for identifying naturalism (“methodological naturalism”) as a “quasi-religion,” having just about all of the characteristics of a religion. (But Plantinga conspicuously avoids overstatement, so… “quasi” and “perhaps” is his language.)
What we have in the west now is a kind of science+naturalism orthodoxy and if you even question it, you’re treated like a heretic. (Except in your private personal life, where you’re allowed to believe in the supernatural?) I don’t know if Gleiser has experienced much at the hands of the Inquisitors yet, but he is definitely a questioner of the orthodoxy. It’s nice to see.
Views expressed are always my own and not my employer's, my church's, my family's, my neighbors', or my pets'. The house plants have authorized me to speak for them, however, and they always agree with me.