By declining to hear this case, they are basically saying that all the major questions were answered in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, and the only remaining issue is whether for-profit corporations have first amendment rights (expansion of Citizens United) that would allow for broader exemption on religious grounds or whether only real breathing people have these rights.
Discussion
NewSupremes already heard this issue in 2012
By declining to hear this case, they are basically saying that all the major questions were answered in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, and the only remaining issue is whether for-profit corporations have first amendment rights (expansion of Citizens United) that would allow for broader exemption on religious grounds or whether only real breathing people have these rights.